Skip to content

30/04/2026 3:36 PM - Amber CQE Prep

⬅️ [30/04/2026 9:35 AM - SNU Presentation](<./30_04_2026 9_35 AM - SNU Presentation.md>) | ⬆️ [2026 - April](<./README.md>) | [30/04/2026 6:18 PM](<./30_04_2026 6_18 PM.md>) ➡️

30/04/2026 3:36 PM - Amber CQE Prep

s5 How did you choose the help seeking resources

s5 why is GENAI once if it has two entries.

s7 could flow better. I feel like we jumped from slide 4 to 7 conceptually.

s9 I am not sure exactly why we are discussing this. Cool but why type thing.

s14 gets to gap. But I haven't been led to see problems yet. Perhaps be mentioning those throughout the intro. Hold my hand.

S17? Why is it good to have those properties?

In general I would like to see more figures and less text. Or if there is text, make it easier to use by putting it in figures.

s23 too much text. Difficult to interpret.

s25 what do you mean by validity not carrying over? Is this a good thing? Why?

s31 have the gap be bigger and more prominent so we can see what you mean when you say this addresses the gap.

s33 do people get double counted in both CS and CS and other?

s36 Well explained by ease of access. Do people find that they are getting what they need from the methods? Do they get more out of or less out of teaching team versus AI?

s40 nitpick but it looks like the text "Recommendations" is speaking because of the text box. And I guess it kinda is but it feels odd.

s42 match background colors or put boxes around charts.

s45 pause in speaking between insights so that it is better separated. It was hard to understand what happened when we moved from the first bullet to the second.

s45 So it seems that ease of use trumps everything.

s45 I would like more detail and motivation for this recomendation.

s48 Bold "I have a lot to do"

s49 or 50 motivate why it is still useful to look at self efficacy when you say that there are other reasons. The way you said it felt like you were saying your results were not useful.

Throughout the colors shift a lot. Having a consistent color language would make it feel more cohesive.

When the gap is presented, we should be able to easily cast our minds back and see why those are gaps.

Discuss work logically, not chronologically

In key takeaways, tie back to your gaps.

remember the intellectual funnel!


⬅️ [30/04/2026 9:35 AM - SNU Presentation](<./30_04_2026 9_35 AM - SNU Presentation.md>) | ⬆️ [2026 - April](<./README.md>) | [30/04/2026 6:18 PM](<./30_04_2026 6_18 PM.md>) ➡️